| bio | website | hatzopoulos.ca |
|---|---|---|
| location | Canada | |
| age | 33 | |
| visits | member for | 10 months |
| seen | yesterday | |
| stats | profile views | 41 |
Anthony Hatzopoulos is a creative developer, technologist, and programmer living in Montreal. He also works for Real Estate Webmasters.
|
Sep 1 |
comment |
SEO: Make hashtag links look static You say you display all your content vertically. Does this mean all these sections, including the entire blog are all on one big html page? Or are you using javascript to being the content into the page when they click those <li> in your navigation? |
|
Aug 30 |
answered | HTTP 303 redirection and robots.txt |
|
Aug 27 |
comment |
Forbid content in google results summary @YardenST It has nothing to do with tricking googlebot. It has to do with keeping the page the same for every page load or loading stuff to provide a speed improvement. The phone number changes on the fly so it should be requested by the user on a click. Same as ads are done with javascript so bots do not follow them, etc. This is not cloaking or tricking. |
|
Aug 25 |
comment |
Forbid content in google results summary @YardenST I will have to disagree with you 100%. There is no difference in content to the googlebot. Its the same for everyone. |
|
Aug 25 |
comment |
Why is honest cloaking for Ajax considered bad practice? User Experience? You do ajax and that's cool but if you do not let me right click on a link to successfully open in new tab, I will be annoyed and upset if all it does is cause some javascript error or a blank page. Second, hashbang/shebang links suck IMHO. What is wrong with push state. And third if we can't provide a proper URI with all the content then we are only being lazy in my opinion by not writing the fall back. Cloacking seems haphazard and a lazy solution to solve a problem. What about every other search engine bots like DuckDuckGo, Bing, Zandex, etc. |
|
Aug 24 |
answered | serious 404 problem, suggestions for hunting them all down |
|
Aug 24 |
comment |
serious 404 problem, suggestions for hunting them all down Nice job ionFish, I'll check that out as it looks (from the code) like a handy quick checker. You should throw it up on github or something. |
|
Aug 16 |
revised |
Forbid content in google results summary edited tags |
|
Aug 16 |
answered | Forbid content in google results summary |
|
Aug 16 |
comment |
Forbid content in google results summary Why do you have a dynamic phone number changing every hour that is incorrect? |
|
Aug 16 |
answered | Are there any other login products similar to LoginRadius? |
|
Aug 15 |
revised |
Are there any other login products similar to LoginRadius? adding link, removing thanks, and tagging |
|
Aug 15 |
suggested | suggested edit on Are there any other login products similar to LoginRadius? |
|
Aug 15 |
answered | Tracking down memory issues affecting a website |
|
Aug 13 |
comment |
Challenging nameserver problem google.com/?q=site:http://pineapple.io vs google.com/?q=site:http://ns2.deluxetracking.com looks like everything is 301 to me and index is larger for pineapple.io |
|
Aug 13 |
comment |
Challenging nameserver problem I am not sure what that HTTP/1.0 (without Host header) is supposed to do. What does 'Fetch as Google' give you when you type in something like /tags/ruby on google.com/webmasters/tools/… |
|
Aug 13 |
comment |
Challenging nameserver problem Where does it say that? |
|
Aug 13 |
answered | Challenging nameserver problem |
|
Aug 13 |
comment |
Challenging nameserver problem Are you using apache to redirect or ruby or other? |
|
Aug 13 |
comment |
Challenging nameserver problem If I were you I would just start over since it is a new domain/project. On your ns2.deluxetracking.com domain just add a robots.txt with global disallow and then add that domain to webmaster tools seperately and submit a removal request from there. This will/should remove the ns2 links from the index. It takes time to do it the slow 301 way |