meta user
network profile
| bio | website | not-implemented.com |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 2 years, 10 months |
| seen | Apr 18 at 11:55 | |
| stats | profile views | 47 |
|
Feb 15 |
awarded | Cleanup |
|
Feb 15 |
comment |
Should I include “www” in my canonical URLs? What are the pros and cons? @John Conde: I think the edit you approved made the question worse.. "My question is fairly simple to complex and want to know the in's and outs of www vs non-www." was edited in, which is broken english and doesn't make sense in any case. |
|
Feb 15 |
revised |
Should I include “www” in my canonical URLs? What are the pros and cons? rolled back to a previous revision |
|
Dec 28 |
awarded | Favorite Question |
|
Jul 23 |
awarded | Constituent |
|
Jul 18 |
awarded | Caucus |
|
Jul 13 |
awarded | Popular Question |
|
Jul 8 |
awarded | Yearling |
|
Dec 30 |
awarded | Popular Question |
|
Jul 9 |
awarded | Yearling |
|
May 27 |
awarded | Nice Answer |
|
May 17 |
awarded | Commentator |
|
Apr 4 |
awarded | Taxonomist |
|
Apr 2 |
comment |
Will registering a .info domain have any SEO impact? I heard that outgoing links from .edu domains are worth more.. is that a myth too? |
|
Dec 11 |
awarded | Quorum |
|
Nov 21 |
comment |
Google not following “canonical” directive for a certain type of URLs This seems to have worked; thanks. It's still very weird because pages like wowhead.com/item=2454 use and have always used relative URLs and always worked. :S |
|
Nov 21 |
accepted | Google not following “canonical” directive for a certain type of URLs |
|
Nov 18 |
comment |
Google not following “canonical” directive for a certain type of URLs I didn't and it would be very complex to do; since relative URLs work for all other page types I don't see why it would be the problem =( |
|
Nov 18 |
comment |
Google not following “canonical” directive for a certain type of URLs it happens on all NEW blog posts, even if they are only minutes old. We use relative paths for all other page types and it has always worked. |
|
Nov 18 |
asked | Google not following “canonical” directive for a certain type of URLs |
