meta user
network profile
| bio | website | vyznev.net |
|---|---|---|
| location | Helsinki, Finland | |
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 1 year, 4 months |
| seen | 5 hours ago | |
| stats | profile views | 95 |
I like programming in Perl and C. I know Java and PHP too (I'm a MediaWiki developer), but I can't really say I like them. I keep meaning to learn Python some day, but never seem to get around to it.
I'm working on a Ph.D. in biomathematics. I also like programming puzzles and cryptography.
Please consider any (original) code I post to Stack Overflow (and other Stack Exchange sites) to be released under CC-Zero unless stated otherwise. You may do whatever you want with it and don't have to credit me in any way, although of course that would be nice.
|
Jun 28 |
revised |
Directing from a 1und1 hosting solution, with urls intact fix code example so it won't produce an infinite redirect loop |
|
Jun 28 |
awarded | Civic Duty |
|
Jun 28 |
revised |
Multiple 301 redirect and massive loss of ranking added 154 characters in body |
|
Jun 28 |
answered | Multiple 301 redirect and massive loss of ranking |
|
Jun 26 |
comment |
Conditional AddHandler Directive +1, excellent suggestion. I edited your answer to add a code example; I didn't test it, though, so any errors in it should be blamed on me. |
|
Jun 26 |
revised |
Conditional AddHandler Directive add link to docs and sample code |
|
Jun 25 |
answered | What are the Consequences for using Relative Location Headers? |
|
Jun 25 |
answered | Should I add a “nofollow” attribute to download links, or disallow the URLs in robots.txt? |
|
Jun 25 |
comment |
Should I add a “nofollow” attribute to download links, or disallow the URLs in robots.txt? While some search engines might abort the request if the MIME type is something they can't handle, disallowing the download URLs in robots.txt would still be a good idea if you don't want them to request those URLs to begin with (e.g. if merely starting the request is expensive, or if it might have side effects you don't want robots to trigger). |
|
Jun 22 |
answered | How to indicate a page is duplicate content when you control its body but not its head? |
|
Jun 22 |
comment |
How to indicate a page is duplicate content when you control its body but not its head? Google does not recognize rel=canonical links in the document body, precisely because it would be way too easy to inject them into pages that you don't actually control. (Think, for example, of a wiki or other editable web page that doesn't filter out <link> tags.) |
|
Jun 22 |
answered | Does the 'Server' header serve any purpose? |
|
Jun 22 |
answered | difference between accept and content-type http headers |
|
Jun 10 |
comment |
pulp pedia article deletion Ps. Looks like it's been discussed before. You could also try bringing it up at the Wikipedia admins' noticeboard; since the site is also loading Wikipedia's JavaScript, it would be easy for Wikipedia admins to black it out or otherwise disable it that way, should they want to. |
|
Jun 10 |
comment |
pulp pedia article deletion They're also not properly complying with the attribution requirements in Wikipedia's license (CC-By-SA 3.0 / GFDL), and they may also be abusing Wikimedia trademarks (although they could fix both issues fairly easily by changing the footer on their pages). For the former, you could follow the non-compliance process listed on the page svick linked to above (as long as you've contributed some content to Wikipedia); for the latter, it may be best to contact the WMF directly. |
|
Jun 10 |
comment |
Website falsely blocked because of spam. Does anyone know how we should proceed? Since you've found the solution yourself, could you please post it as an answer and accept it? Thanks! |
|
Jun 9 |
awarded | Enlightened |
|
Jun 9 |
awarded | Nice Answer |
|
May 30 |
comment |
Use - or misuse - of ETags @BobbyJack: If you found this answer useful, could you please mark it as accepted (click on the check mark on the left). That way, the StackExchange software won't keep bumping the question to the front page. You might want to do the same for your other questions, too. Thanks! |
|
May 30 |
answered | Are webhosts that require NS instead of a CNAME common? |
