Reputation
6,395
Top tag
Next privilege 10,000 Rep.
Access moderator tools
Badges
11 35
Newest
 Nice Answer
Impact
~227k people reached

Aug
21
comment 301 redirect to 404 page or set status code to 404 and stay on page?
@WPRookie82: As far as anyone except you and your webserver is concerned, there's no difference between a non-existent page and an existing page that returns a 404 response.
Aug
19
comment Index page content identical to page 1 of a gallery-type website
@WordPressDeveloper: Which way would you point it? If you make the permalink URLs canonical, users will never see the index URL in SERPs. If you make the index URL canonical, you risk having old content dropped from Google when the index page changes, because Google still thinks the old pages are just copies of the canonical index page. Anyway, none of the sites I checked with this kind of a pagination scheme (mostly blogs and webcomics) used rel=canonical, and they all seem to do just fine on Google.
Aug
18
answered Index page content identical to page 1 of a gallery-type website
Aug
9
revised Apache Rewrite Rule non-www to www + http to https + remove trailing slash
added 82 characters in body
Aug
9
revised Apache Rewrite Rule non-www to www + http to https + remove trailing slash
added 431 characters in body
Aug
9
answered Apache Rewrite Rule non-www to www + http to https + remove trailing slash
Aug
9
comment Apache Rewrite Rule non-www to www + http to https + remove trailing slash
There's no point in removing trailing slashes from HTTP(S) URLs with an empty path. The URLs http://example.com and http://example.com/ are canonically equivalent per RFC 3986, and it's up to your browser which one it chooses to show in the address bar.
Jul
17
comment Will canonical tag referencing unsecure HTTP URLs on a HTTPS page cause the unsecure message?
Here's a live example. (Note that HTTPS support on SE is still experimental, and in particular, some pages may still have insecure images. However, user profile pages shouldn't have any, at least if the user in question is using Gravatar for their user icon.)
Jul
14
awarded  Nice Answer
Jul
14
awarded  Notable Question
Jun
29
awarded  Revival
Jun
29
revised Server log what does “ho=<something>” mean?
added 135 characters in body
Jun
28
revised Server log what does “ho=<something>” mean?
added 238 characters in body
Jun
28
answered Server log what does “ho=<something>” mean?
Jun
28
comment Most invariant URI to refer to a HTML5 element from w3.org?
You've obviously spent some thought on this, but for the rest of us, it might help if you told us a little bit more about what you'd need such a URI for. Knowing more about your motivation might help in judging the relative merits of different options, or it might even suggest some completely different solution.
Jun
27
comment How do you tell search engines not to index this page just yet, but maybe in the future?
...that is, unless there's something meaningful that users could do even with a "blank" page, such as supplying information for it. (Even then, though, it may be better not to link to the blank page directly, but to some different URL that indicates the (possible) absence of data. Note that you'll need to deal with the edge case where a user follows such a link after the page has recently been created; see for example how Wikipedia does it.)
Jun
26
comment How do you tell search engines not to index this page just yet, but maybe in the future?
@Binarysurf: According to the OP, they're using a custom script to serve dynamic content for "virtual pages" constructed out of information stored in a database (just like Wikipedia, SE and most major websites do nowadays). This does mean that "regular web server behavior" doesn't apply -- as far as the web server (Apache, IIS, nginx, etc.) is concerned, the content-generating script exists and runs, so it defaults to a "200 OK" response, unless the script tells it otherwise. I'm just suggesting that the OP should make their script send a 404 response, if there's no actual content to show.
Jun
26
answered How do you tell search engines not to index this page just yet, but maybe in the future?
Jun
25
comment 403 Error Fetching Image with JS
+1, this appears to be the correct explanation in this case. Further testing shows that the server accepts an empty referrer (-e ""), as a browser would send if you typed the image URL into the address bar, but not a referral from another site. (Also, despite what I suggested in earlier comments, the Accept header does not seem to make any difference for this site.)
Jun
25
answered What is Google's policy about separate content on same URLs in mobile and desktop versions?