Hot answers tagged microformats
3
Here is your example HTML in the testing tool.
Works perfectly fine for me, with everything you say is a problem recognized, and no warning:
The example code from Google's docs does display the warning, but that's because of a syntax error which is breaking the markup:
<img class="photo" src="anvil_executive.jpg />
Note the src attribute is ...
2
Google recommends using microdata, but it does support three formats: microdata, microformats, and RDFa. A big reason to choose microdata would be that the examples that Google gives on it's website and those on schema.org are in the microdata format.
Here is a site that has a huge table of the various advantages and disadvantages of the three formats. ...
1
There is no schema entry for FAQ, you most likely best of adding it as a 'WebPage'. or using the about. It's not required to use rich snippets for all pages. It holds little SEO weight if any. Google will be able to establish it as a FAQ page without any markup of this type.
1
No using RDFa, microdata, richsnippets, and HTML5 does not help your rankings in search engines. If you use Google rich snippet testing tool they'll actually tell you if a page will potentially appear in search results with rich snippets or not. For example a page using hCard but with a lot of other content on that page google may determine the main ...
Only top voted, non community-wiki answers of a minimum length are eligible

