Tag Info

Hot answers tagged

3

What makes it worthwhile providing metadata? The fact that companies like Google and Microsoft provide this metadata also themselves? Or the fact that these companies make use of the metadata you provide? The Schema.org sponsor’s search engines provide no (Bing, Yahoo, Yandex) to little (Google) metadata using the Schema.org vocabulary, and this might ...


1

Schema.org neither requires nor recommends specific image dimensions. For an ImageObject, you may specify the image’s height and width with the height and width properties. Consumers of the data would have their own rules, if any at all. In case of Google Search tl;dr: For some Rich Snippets that use the image property, no dimensions are specified. For ...


1

Using meta (and link) elements for Microdata is fine. Sometimes there is even no sensible alternative to it, e.g., if specific codes have to be provided where it would make no sense to show them to your users. Google even uses meta in some of their Rich Snippets examples: Products and Software Apps: <meta itemprop="priceCurrency" content="USD" /> ...


1

About your HTML: You can (and should) use semantic markup, of course. So, for example, the product container should probably be an article instead of a div, and the "Product Name" should probably be an h1 instead of span. Like Martin Hepp writes also, you have to use link instead of meta if the value is a URI. About your Schema.org: The price property ...



Only top voted, non community-wiki answers of a minimum length are eligible