Hot answers tagged

4

These are really two separate questions: if you're thinking of implementing AMP, that shouldn't affect your choice between HTTP and HTTPS in any way. So you have two choices to make: "do you want to implement AMP?" (and it sounds like you do); and "do you want to go HTTPS?", for which I've written an answer here.


3

Despite what so many SEOs tell you, search is not about keywords. Search engines do not match keywords directly and have not for a very long time. It is all about semantics (linguistics). You have several issues. 1] Not enough content to attract search users. The more content you have, the more potential you will have to attract users. Think about it, the ...


2

Are both sets of text content (in an HTML document) equally visible to search engines Absolutely yes: both variants are fully equal. All search engines understand unicode (your second example), the encoded HTML entities from the first example are not a problem too. The entity encoding is nothing other as another encoding like, win-8859-1, utf-8 or ...


2

The problem is not with Google. Your site is not redirecting properly: $ curl --head http://www.example.com/ HTTP/1.1 301 Moved Permanently Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 13:09:29 GMT Server: Apache/2.4.7 (Ubuntu) Location: https://www.www.example.com/ Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 You are issuing an https redirect with www.www in it when http is ...


2

One of the primary places Google looks for a date for any given page is in the URL. If a date is found in the URL, it is considered to be a strong indicator over most if not all other sources including within the response header. From this answer: How to tell how old a page is? 4] Google looks for a date within the URL. It looks for the following ...


2

When you have uploaded the structure data on your website, as usually structure data will take time to show in search results.


1

The links you're talking about are called sitelinks. Google's official page on the topic can be found here. There is no way to guarantee that sitelinks will appear. Google decides whether or not they want to show them, based on how useful they think it'll be to the user, and how high-quality they think your site is. You can increase the chances of getting ...


1

...Google identifies index.php and the site's root as a single page These two things can totally be different. ...that redirecting index.php to root is not something we should worry about. I'd personally worry about it because: index.php is not a friendly URL especially if it has a query string attached to it. not having a friendly URL could ...


1

I have client who earns pagerank 2 with the same issue as yours. I redirected index.php as default home page into (even) folder /id/. However, I include canonical as an exact information for google to see ... "where my home address is actually" That means that what google needs is our final decision in related to this. As long as we include meta ...


1

First of Google does not search or fill up information like user did, so do not worry about 600 links, that is generated only when user enter any alphabet. Yes Googlebot execute JS very well, but they don't feel alphabet in search box. Hope it clear your doubt. From SEO perspective, I will do same breadcrumb navigation as like permalink in webpages, so ...


1

You don't see your website when you search for "data strategy", "the data strategy", "thedatastrategy" that's because there are other websites with stronger domain authority who are targeting these keywords. You have to do proper SEO for your website using these keywords to show your website on first page when someone types these keywords.If you do ...


1

The search engines should find the sitemap as you have it. However, I would create accounts for Google and Bing anyway and submit them through their tools. Having said that, there may be no reason to do this. SEOs like to advise creating sitemaps without context. It is often an unnecessary step. Sitemaps are only required for extremely large sites or sites ...


1

I Googled "Websitename review -Site:example.com" The site: operator should be all lowercase.


1

According to this article Google does index JavaScript generated content and it takes precedence over the static content it replaces. Which makes sense considering the first point in the quality guidelines. Make pages primarily for users, not for search engines. Thus how the page appears to the user is how it is indexed.



Only top voted, non community-wiki answers of a minimum length are eligible