Webmasters Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for pro webmasters. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

SE sites allow tags chaining like this:


This site has more than 700 tags. If up to 5 tags can be chained, there are

700*700*700*700*700 = 168070000000000

links that google can crawl. Can it be harmful?

share|improve this question
up vote 1 down vote accepted

Can internal linking create excessive web server load?

Not unless your server is already struggling - Googlebot (unlike many poorly-conceived spiders and some recursive downloading agents) throttles requests and even allows webmasters to specify how often Googlebot should visit pages via Google Webmaster Tools (if your server is already struggling).

Can it be harmful?

Yes, because there are plenty of poorly-conceived spiders and recursive downloading agents out there which can bring your server to its knees if you've created interlinked quagmires (particularly so if these are resource-intensive dynamically-generated pages).

I am having a hard time seeing how your site's users benefit from this feature if there are hundreds of tags.

Wouldn't a site search feature be better-suited to users' needs?

Why is there a need to map up to five categories' union to a unique URI?

share|improve this answer

My thought is that if Google sees a tag with the url: twicks-website.com/posts-with-awesome-tag

it will visit that url only once when it is indexing, if it sees it multiple times on the site, there's no need to visit it again in that indexing session. It WILL visit and index each of the 700 tags, but there's no reason it should visit a tag more than once... it would overload your server and cost Google more money.

share|improve this answer
This is almost true. But pages with chaining tags are "real" pages with similar though not equal content and they can be crawled and even indexed. – Иван Feb 26 '11 at 12:18

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.