Take the 2-minute tour ×
Webmasters Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for pro webmasters. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I'm having problems inserting Rich Snippet code for a product. I literally copied it from some Google page and edited it to my product. The Google Webmaster's Rich Snippet tool gives the error:

In order to generate a preview with rich snippets, either price or review or availability needs to be present.

But it does have the data about price: "Offerdetails: Item 2 (...) Item 2 property price: ..."

So, will Google still be able to find the price given for the product in the snippets? Or is the error real?

The code is used:

<div itemscope="" itemtype="http://data-vocabulary.org/Product"><span itemprop="brand">Ten Cate</span> <span itemprop="name">Katoensatijnen dekbedovertrek</span><a href="http://reclameblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/satijn.png"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-41880" alt="ten cate katoensatijnen dekbedovertrek" src="http://reclameblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/satijn-300x199.png" width="300" height="199" /></a>&nbsp;Beoordeling: <span itemprop="rating" style="color: #00ad00;">4.5</span><span itemprop="offerDetails" itemscope="" itemtype="http://data-vocabulary.org/Offer">Normale prijs: €49.95 Vandaag voor:<meta itemprop="currency" content="EUR" />€<span itemprop="price">24.99</span>Aanbieding loopt tot <time itemprop="priceValidUntil" datetime="2014-05-19">19 mei 2014!</time><span itemprop="availability">Vandaag nog verkrijgbaar!</span></span></div>    
share|improve this question
Be careful with Google examples regarding rich snippets. Much of their examples and advice is faulty. I suspect that this is because these pages were written before the code to parse rich snippets. I use the schema.org examples most though they have gotten even more confusing lately. I have not parsed your code, but the most common mistake I have seen here is nesting elements in types appropriately. –  closetnoc May 13 at 15:29
add comment

1 Answer 1

As noted in the comments, Google's examples are often incorrect. Generally the examples from Schema.org are correct and instructive, though their breadcrumb navigation syntax is a notable exception (Google's is correct for that).

If you go to http://schema.org/Product and run the first example code through the Stuctured Data Testing Tool, you'll see that it functions correctly.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.