Webmasters Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for pro webmasters. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

With a wordpress setup as follows of pages, custom posts, a custom taxonomy of colours and rewrite rules in place:




Archive by colour:



etc ...

I could quite feasibly structure archives to be found at the following




In the context of how a user could navigate a site I can see the benefits of having both paths available but pointing to what is essentially the same content.

Should this be avoided with respect to SEO and avoiding duplicate content?

share|improve this question

migrated from wordpress.stackexchange.com May 13 '14 at 13:40

This question came from our site for WordPress developers and administrators.

up vote 1 down vote accepted

If you need these two URLs being accessible for users, you need to choose one URL as the indexed one for search engines and put to the second one a rel="canonical" tag refering the first one. That way, these two URLs will be accessible for users but just one will be marked as valid (= indexed) for search engines to avoid duplicate content issues.

For example, you choose the first one (http://www.example.com/fruits/colour/red) and in the second one, you add this tag <link rel="canonical" href="http://www.example.com/fruits/colour/red" />. That way, all the SEO value will be associated to the first URL.

share|improve this answer
I agree with you with the above example, but perhaps it wasn't a great one to illustrate my point. Say for example it was 'health-benefits' etc... or something of equal weight to fruits and vegetables when cross referencing. – noelmcg May 13 '14 at 14:29
OK I have edited my answer. – Zistoloen May 13 '14 at 14:53
Cheers @zistoloen, thanks for the updated answer. Would there still be a penalty if the individual archive pages had different introductory text (but still essentially the same list of content/links) – noelmcg May 13 '14 at 17:26
It depends. If on these pages, you have 3 lines of unique text and 100 links with the same content, it's not good. If you have 10 lines of unique text and 20 links with the same content, it can be safe. If you're not sure, increase the size of unique text on these pages. – Zistoloen May 13 '14 at 19:59
cheers. Makes sense, thanks alot. – noelmcg May 13 '14 at 20:07

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.