Webmasters Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for pro webmasters. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I am amongst a discussion about a number of broken links on a site which has discovered by a checker tool.

My argument is that the majority of these links are from the CSS in the form of background images on small elements such as buttons and menu items (which has happened from an old site move).

How does Google view this? I thought they would only negatively affect your SEO if they were broken anchor link elements on the page?

share|improve this question
Maybe the only little negative impact on SEO is HTTP requests to load images take time for nothing; and a site which loads faster is good for SEO. – Zistoloen Feb 14 '14 at 15:20
up vote 2 down vote accepted

Those aren't broken links. They're just missing images/files. Since CSS/HTML validation is not a ranking factor these won't affect your rankings.

share|improve this answer
They will still return 404 not found errors so worth cleaning up but yeah, not going to cause any negative effect with regards to ranking. – zigojacko Feb 14 '14 at 15:11
@GeoffJackson-zigojacko then again it is also increasing the load time as Zistoloen stated – Liam Sorsby Feb 14 '14 at 16:04

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.