Sign up ×
Webmasters Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for pro webmasters. It's 100% free, no registration required.

One of the issues with duplicate content is that links can be split across several versions of your page, it was my understanding the a 301 redirect is really the only option for retaining some of the link juice, however, looking at some answers here and on other forums it looks like some people believe the canonical tag will have the same effect as a 301 (in the search engines eyes).

Does the canonical tag tell the search engines that the links pointing to duplicate pages should count for the original or does it simply tell them which version of the page you want indexed?

share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

up vote 2 down vote accepted

It just fixes duplicate content issues by telling the search engines which page is the "main page" that they should list in their index. It's not an actual link and thus does not pass PR.

Additional URL properties, like PageRank and related signals, are transferred as well.

Quoted from the link below. I either missed or forgot that part since I read that blog post. Based on that sentence I would say the "main" canonical URL would receive the PR of all of the children URLs that point to it. So if was the main URL and was a canonical URL then a link to would be essentially a link to

share|improve this answer
Well, technically Google treats the canonical page and any pages with it as their canonical URL as the same page. So PR is technically being passed. Though I guess it's more accurate to say that they all share the same PR. See:… – Lèse majesté Nov 15 '10 at 4:09

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.