Take the 2-minute tour ×
Webmasters Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for pro webmasters. It's 100% free, no registration required.

We want to improve our site's SEO. The page is a GWT (javascript based) web page and its content is discovered through a map or a GPS.

Now we have just a normal landing html page, and the map and the detail pages referenced in a sitemap.xml.

I want to achieve better results by:

  • Leaving the html landing page as it is right now, but pointing to the map page (now it does it through JavaScript).
  • In the map (JavaScript page) use the trick and change the body in the servelet with H1, H2, H3... but... do we put a list of links to the details simulating the map of the whole world? Or is better to leave this to the sitemap.xml? With the first way we keep the hierarchy (landing-->map-->details).
  • In the details page use the trick and write html info.

So the question is is it better to have a sitemap.xml or to change the page content to point to the details (they can be thousands)?

share|improve this question
add comment

1 Answer 1

up vote 1 down vote accepted

Since you're talking about a Javascript-based web app, you might want to take a look at Google's recommendation for making AJAX pages crawlable.

If your app observes the URL mapping and HTML snapshot scheme, it's already visible to crawlers.

share|improve this answer
    
Yes, I have already seen that. But what I want to know is if it is better to use sitemaps or a lot of links in the "map for crawling page" –  Pablo Castilla Aug 13 '13 at 14:57
    
@PabloCastilla Both as long as you're not link spamming and as long as it doesn't impede the usability of the site. Links only visible to bots are bad. Helpful links for users are good (in context even better). –  AbsoluteƵERØ Aug 13 '13 at 15:51
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.