Webmasters Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for pro webmasters. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I have pages with noindex in robots meta tag (specifically inner site search results pages). Because my site has many pages and Google hasn't crawled them all and I'm trying to help his crawler focus and not waste time on irrelevant pages (such as these noindex pages).

If I add a nofollow to the a href that links to these pages, will that help? Is the noindex in the target pages helpful to avoid crawl time 'waste'? Should I make those pages in a specific folder and block through robots.txt?

share|improve this question

If you want to avoid loss of time for web-crawlers, you can put nofollow in robots meta tag for webpages which already have noindex but putting a rel="nofollow" in <a> tags in webpages links which link webpages with noindex in robots meta tag seems irrelevant to me.

rel="nofollow" tells to search engines that you can't trust on these links. There is no reason why you can't trust on webpages of your website.

share|improve this answer
I didn't explain correctly. I meant adding a nofollow to the <a href> not the page itself... – Noam Jul 5 '13 at 9:08
I have edited my answer to explain you why a rel="nofollow" is not a good idea either. – Zistoloen Jul 5 '13 at 9:22
@Noam: But, as Zistoloen implies, if you don't have a nofollow in the robots meta tag for the page then the bot will need to crawl the noindex page in order to extract the links. In order to prevent the page from being crawled then block with robots.txt. – w3dk Jul 5 '13 at 15:10

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.