Take the 2-minute tour ×
Webmasters Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for pro webmasters. It's 100% free, no registration required.

My website is mostly a collection of things I've written, ranging from short to long; the very shortest are a large screenful and the very longest are the length of a short book. Most of the longer ones are broken into pages.

One Alertbox column said basically that pagination was very common practice, but it's better to have all of one logical page located on that one single page.

Basically I wanted to get a usability and other purposes suggestion on whether I should depaginate works so that they are one single page, and redirect the other pages to the combined page. If it's a judgment call, what are the pro's and con's?

share|improve this question
add comment

closed as primarily opinion-based by Anagio, John Conde Oct 11 '13 at 12:46

Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

1 Answer

You want to balance how long it takes to load the first page so that users can easily get started with the hassle of having users interrupt their reading to load the next page.

From my experience with SEO, you want your first page to load in under 3 seconds. Longer than that and users start clicking back out of your website and looking for another site (which causes your Google rankings to fall).

The HTTP archive tracks average web page size. The current average total page size (including images) is 1311 KB.

I downloaded a small book: Earnest Hemmingway's Old Man and the Sea. I saved it to a text file. It has 26,582 words. Uncompressed it is 133KB. Compressed with gzip (as you might have your website configured to serve it) it is 45KB.

Even a small book is going to negligible compared to size of most web pages (including images). Including the full text of a small book is about equivalent to adding a single new picture onto the page. If putting the full text of a small book on one page pushes your site over 3 seconds to load, it would be better to remove images from the page than to paginate.

For content the size of a small book, you should put it all in one page and not paginate.

share|improve this answer
1  
Separate pages are easier for (non-technical) users to bookmark. If you include a "small book" on one page you'll need to provide plenty of internal anchors/ids for users to easily bookmark - but this will be harder for some users to manage. –  w3d Mar 15 '13 at 10:16
    
"which causes your Google rankings to fall": it would be caused by the long loading time itself, but not by the user's visit duration, right? (anyway, Google would know this visit duration only for sites that host Google scripts like Analytics) –  unor Mar 16 '13 at 20:56
    
I haven't seen any evidence that Google looks at user duration as a ranking signal. They do look at how many people use the back button from your site and look at other sites in the SERPs. –  Stephen Ostermiller Mar 17 '13 at 0:19
    
Related to this, you can put the entire text on a single page, and then use Javascript to paginate it, e.g. jQuery pagination. Search engines and users both win! More info can be found on Stack Overflow or Google. –  Michael Hampton Apr 14 '13 at 19:24
add comment

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.