Webmasters Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for pro webmasters. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I recently implemented many SEO techniques for a company on their asp.net website; in 6 months, we jumped from a PR1 to a PR3. But I'm having issues with google backlinking.

Here are some of the things I've done:

  1. Not only did I set up their own Google+ page 6 months ago, I update it pretty much daily with links, pictures, etc., and I blog about it on my own personal Google+ page and post links, etc. ...
  2. They have their own Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, and all are updated almost daily.
  3. I've listed in as many quality, relevant directories as possible 6 months ago; I've avoided link farms.
  4. The site is solid SEO-wise. Key-phrase rich URLs, schema.org & rich snippets.
  5. No duplicate content ... www or non-www 301's, trailing slashes, etc. ... all taken care of.
  6. Probably a ton of other things, but basically, the site is all set, SEO-wise.

Here's what's confounding:

When I do a link:www.example.com in Bing/Yahoo, it shows many backlinks. When I do a link:www.example.com in google, it shows up 0 links. Or when I use a site-ranker like Web Site Rank Tool it's showing 0 backlinks from Google. Any suggestions would be appreciated!

share|improve this question

migrated from stackoverflow.com Nov 10 '12 at 19:51

This question came from our site for professional and enthusiast programmers.

up vote 1 down vote accepted

-To best estimate the back-links to your website you can:

  1. Register the site to Google Webmaster Tools and go to Traffic -> Links to your site
  2. Register the site to Google Analytic and go to : Traffic Sources -> Referrals

It takes time to this data to appear, so be be patience :)

There are many issues using the link:DOMAIN filter, it depends on the TLD of Google website and many other factors.

share|improve this answer
Thanks YardenST ... I've done all the google webmaster tools, etc., but I appreciate your advise! – Jason Weber Nov 10 '12 at 23:43

We have a PR6 site and Google shows only 198 backlinks for our domain.

I wouldn't worry about it, Google's Link: feature has never been reliable or meaningful for some years.

Here's a good article by Rand Fishkin (SEO Moz) that goes into the issue in more depth: http://www.seomoz.org/blog/google-link-command-busting-the-myths

share|improve this answer
Wow, that's a lot to digest ... but thank you for taking the time to read my question and respond. I'll definitely parse what Matt Cutts has to say. Thanks again Tom! – Jason Weber Nov 10 '12 at 3:59

Please read about google new update on penguin and Google envelope ,links are not so popular now as they come across spammy , as for daily updates in Smo don't do daily as google also thinks this as spam spread it out over time maybe twice a month ,and also for hard targeting keywords o rank page one google you have to wait from 3 months to one year like I had to for many sites of my own and clients sites I have been doing seo for over six years I have lots of websites I use in testing as I see for myself what's working or not , I to have sites that were page one then disappear then appear doing the google shuffle they eventually come back it's just google finding new sites and yours will go back

share|improve this answer
Thanks for taking the time to respond, @Kane. My site went from a PR 1, and just recently a PR 3, so Google must have updated their PR'ings. But I'm just wondering about why link:mydomain.com isn't showing any backlinks in google. Thanks for the Panda and Penguin updates ... although just about every page is rich, quality content complete with quality youtube engineering demonstrations. But the basic message is that Google wants you to do things, just not too many things ... hehe .... Thanks again for your time, Kane. – Jason Weber Nov 12 '12 at 19:37

Most or all of those social media sites add rel="nofollow" to all external links. And the value of links from most directories is dubious at best (not that I don't ever use them but they are suspect).

Any link that can be obtained in an automated fashion probably isn't worth having and if you are that religious about social media posts (i.e. YouTube everyday‽) you might, in the eyes of a search engine seem like a 'robot.'

A month ago (in Oct. 2012) GoogleWebmasterHelp added this video to YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=chuhSmwsL7s&feature=plcp

I think very much applies to the spirit of your question. If, in the eyes of a search engine, the things you are doing seem automated you might not get much from them.

There is also the rumored 'Over Optimization Penalty.'

It sounds like you are doing the right things but perhaps trying to hard.

share|improve this answer
thanks for the link Adam! – Jason Weber Nov 10 '12 at 6:49

I don't think Yarden is right . Google not always list all the back links. I had 263 back links in webmaster tools , but one fine day its showing only 63. I have more unique back links displayed in Alexa.Then i tried "SERPAttacks" ,it too show erroneous data. I am too confused . Don't know where to look for reliable list of back links.

share|improve this answer
Hi Susan. Thanks for responding. I understand black hat and white hat SEO techniques, but still, many of 'em are unreliable at best. There's a difference between rel=nofollow and rel=noindex pages. Twitter is rel=nofollow, yet I get indexed there all the time. As far as guestimating the number of backlinks you have out there, it's like you really just have to keep doing what you're doing. Keep backlinking; some tools are more accurate than others. – Jason Weber Feb 11 '13 at 8:57

protected by dan Feb 13 '15 at 6:38

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.