Webmasters Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for pro webmasters. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

refer to this URL: http://imagemechanics.com.au/

Every page seems to have its own unique URL, but the "/#!/" leads me to believe it's all one giant page with anchor tags defining the sections. Is each section truly its own .html page or is it just one page?

share|improve this question

closed as too localized by danlefree Sep 26 '12 at 0:53

This question is unlikely to help any future visitors; it is only relevant to a small geographic area, a specific moment in time, or an extraordinarily narrow situation that is not generally applicable to the worldwide audience of the internet. For help making this question more broadly applicable, visit the help center.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

Just a curiosity... the site in question doesn't appear to have constructed the URLs of its /blog/ section correctly - none of it is indexed in Google. Requesting the corresponding ?_escaped_fragment_=/blog/... URL (required by Google) results in a 500 internal server error. However, the sites (few) main pages are. – w3dk Sep 21 '12 at 23:23
up vote 3 down vote accepted

It's not a single page. (This should be obvious just from viewing source.)
There are separate documents, like this one, being loaded via Ajax.

In Firefox, open Firebug and enable the Net tab. When you click the navigation links, you'll be able to see the GET requests for them.

share|improve this answer
How would one determine what percentage of internet users this animated interface would not be compatible with? – user1352762 Sep 21 '12 at 23:01
A similar percentage to those that use Ajax enabled browsers I would have thought. The important metric, however, is how many of your sites users it would be compatible with. I would expect that the site in question has a very high compatibility rate with its expected customers. – w3dk Sep 21 '12 at 23:17

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.