Take the 2-minute tour ×
Webmasters Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for pro webmasters. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I am thinking of releasing a CSS minifaction library, which has dependencies on other libraries.

Since CSS Minification is not something that occurs a lot (compared to optimising PDFs for example), I have two options:

  1. I could make it downloadable, however, it means that the user needs to download 3-4 other libraries, just to make everything run.
  2. I could create a web service that receives a HTTP post and returns the minified file as a response.

Now a days there is a lot of talk about the Cloud and Cloud Services, and perhaps the approach to releasing tools such as this should be included in that discussion as well.

So basically the question is: What are the pros and cons of online/cloud tools compared to downloadable tools?

share|improve this question

3 Answers 3

up vote 1 down vote accepted

The main advantage of downloadable css compressors is offline usage.

The advantage of an online css compressor is security for the user. Some users may not feel comfortable downloading an unknown script.

share|improve this answer

Why not just have it available as a Web application like Google Closure Compiler? The user drops his entire CSS, hits 'minify', and copy-pastes the minified CSS?

share|improve this answer

It depends on the complexity of the install - most inexperienced (and even experienced users) prefer a simple one-click install.

This is probably because most users are looking to fix a problem and want to get to/check a solution quickly.

With that in mind and the easy way people can share via social networks I'd go for a hosted service, you will probably get more traction that way.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.