Take the 2-minute tour ×
Webmasters Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for pro webmasters. It's 100% free, no registration required.

What is the best SEO strategy when aliasing several domains to a primary domain,

  • is it "enough" to just set them up as aliases
  • is it better to alias them and setup some kind of rewrite rules to make the content look like separate domains
  • is it better to set them up as landing pages with slightly different content & then redirect to the main site?

or are there better ways I haven't considered?

-thanks -sean

share|improve this question

migrated from stackoverflow.com Jul 27 '11 at 18:24

This question came from our site for professional and enthusiast programmers.

2 Answers 2

up vote 6 down vote accepted

is it "enough" to just set them up as aliases

is it better to alias them and setup some kind of rewrite rules to make the content look like separate domains

No. If you do this you will have duplicate content issues as the same content can be retrieved from more then one URL. If you have multiple domains you will want to do a 301 redirect from the alternate domains to the primary domain. This will prevent duplicate content issues and if someone ever tries to use an alternate domain they will find the primary instead.

is it better to set them up as landing pages with slightly different content & then redirect to the main site?

No. Those pages will have no SEO value due to having little content and no links to them themselves. So links from those pages will be worthless. You're life will be much easier if you just redirect the alternate domains to the primary domain from the get go.

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks John, makes sense. –  Sean Kimball Jul 27 '11 at 17:00

If you do want to keep two separate sites (and sometimes there are good reasons to do this then my understanding is that in this scenario you should use:

<link rel="canonical" href="url-to-primary-version-of-content">

This instructs the search engine that this content is a duplicate and that the primary (cannonical) source of this information exists at the listed url.

My understanding is that this practice was put in place so that you CAN have duplicate content so long as you correctly reference its canonical source. A great example of where this could be used is for reuters news articles, which are published in many places.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.