I see differences between Google Analytics and Google Webmaster Tools. Why are they different and which is more accurate. How can i interpret data from both correctly?
migrated from stackoverflow.com Apr 6 '11 at 8:02
This question came from our site for professional and enthusiast programmers.
This would exclude most bots and people who did not want to wait for your page to load.
Webmaster tools on the other hand also shows information about how a site performs in the search result pages.
I personally think the analytics data is more useful.
This is a bit like wondering why your Gmail, Google Voice and Google Wave inboxes all contain somewhat different messages.
Google Analytics and Webmaster Tools aren't directly comparable. They do different things. At any rate, both use approximate data and this can be dicey when the overall volume is low and estimations are difficult.