Take the 2-minute tour ×
Webmasters Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for pro webmasters. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I wonder why some website changes their short and user-friendly URLs to long URLs - examples:

cricinfo.com ----> espncricinfo.com

indiafm.com ---> bollywoodhungama.com

Why would a webmaster choose to make that change?

share|improve this question

migrated from stackoverflow.com Mar 7 '11 at 11:19

This question came from our site for professional and enthusiast programmers.

    
The best example of this is http:// o.co –  Greg Mar 7 '11 at 10:04
    
i m not asking for example..i m asking reason –  diEcho Mar 7 '11 at 10:04
    
diEcho: Mostly for business and branding reasons. ESPN adds ESPN label to crickinfo showing (1)ownership (2)reliability. India FM is not a radio, it sounds more describing with bollywood-hungama. Irrelevant / out of topic question. Voting for close. –  Nishant Mar 7 '11 at 10:12
    
@nishant , will u tell me where shoud i ask this?? –  diEcho Mar 7 '11 at 10:15
    
I think Webmasters.SE is more appropriate. But these are business decisions, nothing to do with technical roadblock. So, you better ask some branding manager or forums like that. –  Nishant Mar 7 '11 at 10:17

2 Answers 2

up vote 5 down vote accepted

In these instances the reasons are branding and for SEO.

Crininfo in now part of the growing ESPN sporting network, like Soccernet is - ESPN like to see their branding extending throughout their estate. cricinfo.com still works though.

In the second case I think that branding was a secondary consideration behind the need to get better natural search engine rankings for the expression 'Bollywood' - domains that contain a search term get a natural boost in all search engine algorithms (this is demonstrable by testing the theory, the actual algorithms are usually secret).

EDIT

bollywoodhungama.com is #4 in a Google search for 'Bollywood' - a search with hundreds of millions of choices, so the site is clearly optimised for 'Bollywood' which strengthens SEO as the most likely primary reason for the change.

share|improve this answer
    
but for SEO we can put keyword into meta and many other ways –  diEcho Mar 7 '11 at 10:16
    
Yes the meta tags have a bearing, but the domain name, page title, first H1 tag contents and keyword density have a bigger bearing than meta tags in current search algorithms. Google 'seo boost for keyword in domain' for tips on why the domain name is important for SEO. –  amelvin Mar 7 '11 at 10:19
    
Actually meta tags have no weight in search rankings. –  John Conde Mar 7 '11 at 14:18
    
@John I know that Google stopped using meta tags (except for the description) in 2009, but I'm not certain that every search engine has similarly done so - but I'll bow to your experience. –  amelvin Mar 7 '11 at 18:07
1  
@amelvin Bing recently said they didn't use it as well and since Google and Bing power Yahoo and AOL respectively and those four sites make up the overwhelming majority of searches it's safe to say meta tags have no SEO impact anymore. –  John Conde Mar 7 '11 at 19:19

The most obvious reason is search engine optimisation. If your website can be access from more than one URL, then there's a major hole in your SEO.

The alternative URLs will/should 304 redirect to the original domain. The domain that the companies use as their "primary" domain will be down to where the content and assets are stored, such as images and stylesheets, that may be loaded in with relative paths.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.